The Merger That Changes Everything: Why My SpaceX Thesis Just Got Bigger
I was wrong about one thing.
Not about SpaceX. Not about the orbital data center thesis, not about the launch monopoly, not about Starlink’s subscriber growth curve.
All of that is playing out exactly as expected — faster, in fact.
What I underestimated was the speed at which Elon Musk would force the hand of history.
When I published my SpaceX thesis last month, I told you the orbital data center story was “the $10 trillion wildcard nobody’s pricing in.”
I called it speculative. A future catalyst. Something that might materialize over the next decade if everything broke right.
Then, on February 2nd, 2026, Musk filed papers with the FCC requesting authorization to launch up to one million satellites designed to function as data centers in orbit — and simultaneously announced the largest private merger in human history.
I need to update the thesis. Because what just happened changes the valuation math entirely.
What Just Changed: The Biggest Merger of All Time
On February 2nd, SpaceX officially acquired Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI in an all-stock deal.
The combined entity is valued at $1.25 trillion — SpaceX at $1 trillion, xAI at $250 billion. According to CNBC, this is the largest private merger ever completed. Not in tech. Not in space. In history.
Let me put that in context.
In 2019, when Elon Musk was tweeting about taking Tesla private at $420 (famously, he did not), Tesla’s market cap was roughly $75 billion.
Today, the company he built in a garage in 2002 is worth more than the entire US airline industry, the entire US auto industry, and every publicly traded space company — combined.
But here’s what I want you to focus on, because the mainstream coverage is missing it entirely:
This deal has two very different stories depending on which lens you use.
The official story — the one Musk published in his announcement memo — is about orbital data centers. SpaceX launches the satellites, xAI fills them with intelligence, Grok runs in space powered by infinite solar energy, and humanity transcends the terrestrial energy bottleneck that’s throttling AI progress. It’s a magnificent vision. Musk wrote: “My estimate is that within 2 to 3 years, the lowest cost way to generate AI compute will be in space.”
The FCC Chairman, Brendan Carr, was so excited about the orbital data center filing that he tweeted it would represent “a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization” — a reference to the theoretical scale of civilizations measured by their mastery of planetary energy. The United States government is apparently now in the business of endorsing interplanetary energy strategies.
That’s the official story.
The other story is simpler and, in my view, equally important to understand as an investor.
xAI burned approximately $9.5 billion in the first nine months of 2025 alone.
That figure, reported by The Information, tells you everything about the urgency behind this deal. xAI was not in a position to continue its AI infrastructure buildout at the pace needed to compete with OpenAI and Google. Its Colossus supercomputer in Memphis was already drawing community protests and regulatory scrutiny over its use of gas-powered turbines. Its Grok image generator had enabled the creation and distribution of explicit deepfake content — triggering active investigations in Europe, India, Malaysia, and by the California Attorney General.
What xAI desperately needed was what SpaceX has in abundance: profitable operations, government contract revenue, and a credible IPO path to public market liquidity.
What SpaceX got in return: the ability to walk into its IPO roadshow as the world’s premier AI-space-internet company, not just a rocket maker.
It was, in the words of one analyst, “a bail-out brilliantly packaged as a strategic vision.”
Both things can be true simultaneously. That’s the nuance I want you to hold.
The Number That Should Make You Stop
Here is the financial figure that stopped me cold when I ran the updated math.
SpaceX generated an estimated $8 billion in profit on $15-16 billion in revenue in 2025, according to Reuters. That’s a ~50% profit margin on an aerospace and telecom business. For context: Amazon’s AWS — the most profitable cloud business ever built — runs at margins of around 35-40%. SpaceX’s core operations are already outperforming the benchmark for “best margin business in tech.”
Meanwhile, xAI was burning $9.5 billion in nine months.
What Musk has done is attach a cash incinerator to a cash machine and told investors the combined entity is worth $1.25 trillion. The market, at least so far, believes him.
And here’s the thing: based on how the SpaceX side of the business is performing, I think he might be right about the long-term value — just not necessarily for the reasons he’s stating publicly.
The orbital data center vision requires technical breakthroughs in radiation hardening, in-space cooling, chip reliability, and launch economics that, by the most optimistic estimates, are still 5-7 years away from commercial viability. MoffettNathanson analysts wrote bluntly that the capital requirements for a full-fledged orbital compute buildout are “simply enormous” and that a “full-fledged build is not happening anytime soon.”
But you don’t need orbital data centers to justify the valuation. You need Starlink, which already has 9 million subscribers growing by over 20,000 per day. You need the launch monopoly, which handled more than half of all orbital launches globally in 2025. And you need the option value — the credible, if distant, possibility that SpaceX eventually does to cloud computing what it did to the launch industry.
That option value is now priced through xAI. Whether it ultimately pays off is a separate question.
The Structural Trap Hiding in Plain Sight
I’m going to tell you something that most SpaceX bulls won’t, because I believe that is what separates a good newsletter from a pump sheet.
On February 13th, Bloomberg reported that SpaceX is considering a dual-class share structure for its IPO.
If you’re unfamiliar: a dual-class structure creates two categories of shares. One class — held by insiders and founders — carries dramatically more voting power per share, sometimes 10:1 or even 20:1. The other class — sold to the public — carries standard voting rights but functionally near-zero influence over the company’s direction.
In plain English: if SpaceX implements this structure, you would be buying a financial claim on SpaceX’s earnings, but you would have no meaningful say in how the company is run. Musk would retain voting control with a minority economic stake, exactly as he does at Tesla today — where he owns roughly 13% of the economics but wields near-total influence.
This is not inherently disqualifying. Alphabet, Meta, and Nvidia all succeeded under similar structures. But it is a critical piece of risk disclosure that every investor needs to understand before buying shares on IPO day.
You are not buying a seat at the table. You are buying a ticket to watch Musk build the future from the bleachers.
For some investors, that’s an excellent deal. For others, it’s a dealbreaker. Know which one you are before the prospectus drops.
The Question No One Is Asking: What Happens to Tesla?
Here is where the story gets genuinely interesting — and where I think the second-order opportunity lives.
After the SpaceX-xAI merger was announced, Wedbush Securities put out a note that I’ve been thinking about for two weeks. It stated there is a “growing chance that Tesla will eventually be merged in some form into SpaceX/xAI over the next 12 to 18 months.”
Prediction markets are already pricing this. Polymarket currently gives a 12-24% probability to a formal Tesla-SpaceX merger announcement before June 30, 2026.
Think about what that would actually mean.
A unified “Musk Trinity” — as analysts are calling it — would combine:
Tesla’s robotics and autonomous driving fleet (Optimus, Robotaxi, Full Self-Driving) with xAI’s large language models trained on Grok and an ocean of real-world driving data, and SpaceX’s orbital infrastructure providing global connectivity and eventually compute to every Tesla vehicle on Earth.
This is not a merger of companies. This is the construction of the first vertically integrated planetary AI operating system.
Tesla already has indirect SpaceX exposure. The $2 billion Tesla invested in xAI last year is now, through the merger, an indirect stake in the combined SpaceX-xAI entity. Tesla shareholders are already partially riding the SpaceX rocket — they just don’t realize it yet.
The question is whether Musk makes it official. And more importantly for your portfolio: are you positioned before that announcement, or after?
Where This Leaves the IPO Thesis
Nothing I’ve described above changes the fundamental IPO thesis — if anything, it accelerates it.
The mid-June 2026 timeline remains intact. The $1.5 trillion target valuation is now supported by a combined balance sheet that includes both SpaceX’s proven cash generation and xAI’s AI narrative premium. The $50 billion capital raise — which would shatter Saudi Aramco’s 2019 IPO record — gives Musk the war chest he needs to begin the orbital compute buildout in earnest.
What has changed is the risk profile.
You are no longer investing in a rocket company with a satellite internet business. You are investing in a conglomerate that includes a profitable space infrastructure operator, a cash-burning AI startup under regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions, an indirect stake in X (formerly Twitter), and the world’s most ambitious vision for off-world computing — all controlled by one person through a voting structure designed to ensure that no public shareholder can ever meaningfully challenge him.
That’s an extraordinary opportunity and a genuinely complex risk profile simultaneously.
The investors who do the best from here will be the ones who understand both.
What I’m Doing Right Now
I am not waiting for the IPO. The best returns in events like this have never come from buying on listing day — they’ve come from positioning in the months before, when the narrative is still building and institutional capital hasn’t fully flooded in.
In the premium section of this edition, I’m walking through my complete updated playbook:
✅ The revised valuation model — how the xAI acquisition changes my 2030 price target and what I think SpaceX is actually worth post-merger
✅ The Tesla opportunity — why I think Tesla shareholders are sitting on hidden SpaceX exposure and how to maximize it
✅ The 5 public positions I’m building — including one play that gives you both SpaceX and xAI exposure through a single publicly traded stock most investors have never heard of
✅ The regulatory risk map — a clear-eyed breakdown of the xAI legal exposure across four jurisdictions and how I’m thinking about downside scenarios
✅ The dual-class playbook — what dual-class IPOs have historically returned to public investors vs. founders, and how to structure your position accordingly
✅ The Kardashev wildcard — my updated timeline for when orbital compute becomes commercially real, and which suppliers to own when it does
The window to position before the IPO narrative goes fully mainstream is closing. We are now in the phase where the story is moving from financial media into general media — which historically is the moment institutional FOMO begins, valuations expand faster than fundamentals, and late entrants overpay.
I am not late. And neither are you — yet.
Let’s get to work.
Subscribe to Macro Notes Premium to access the full analysis, including the complete stock selection, allocation strategy, and risk framework.